IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05065349.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing entrepreneurial learning, A multidimensional framework to meet entrepreneurship education stakeholders’ expectations

Author

Listed:
  • Sandrine Le Pontois

    (COACTIS - Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

  • Stéphane Foliard

    (COACTIS - COnception de l'ACTIon en Situation - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne, COACTIS - Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne)

Abstract

There is a need to reconsider the evaluation of entrepreneurial learning in its wide diversity. The aim of this chapter is to offer an integrative framework inspired both by entrepreneurship and education sciences to support the effective and systematic design, management and evaluation of new or existing entrepreneurship programs providing relevant entrepreneurial learning processes and outcomes. With the expectations of the various stakeholders of entrepreneurship education (EE) as a cornerstone, this multidimensional theory-driven framework derived from an integrative literature review includes both teaching model and evaluation model in alignment to facilitate, support and evaluate different learning processes and outcomes for (novice) entrepreneurs. As opposed to a generic approach of evaluation often advocated by previous research on the impact of EE, it provides a clear and useful feedback on EE impact at three levels (individual, institutional, social) applicable to both tailor-made entrepreneurship programs and entrepreneurs' reflective practice and entrepreneurial learning self-assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandrine Le Pontois & Stéphane Foliard, 2025. "Assessing entrepreneurial learning, A multidimensional framework to meet entrepreneurship education stakeholders’ expectations," Post-Print hal-05065349, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05065349
    DOI: 10.4337/9781803922218.00012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05065349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.