IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05064973.html

Policy and Regulation Narratives of Artificial Intelligence : A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Loup Richet

    (GREGOR - Groupe de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School, LAB IAE Paris - Sorbonne - IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Vincent Dutot

    (EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School)

  • Simon Porcher

    (Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres, DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Tra Tran

    (Audencia Business School)

Abstract

Although the impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) on the market, the economy, or customers are often studied, little is known about how governments support the use of AI through policy and regulation narratives. We undertake a textual analysis of 936 national and regional AI policies implemented in 70 countries/regions and focus on AI strategies. Computational text analyses led to the identification of three dimensions of AI government discourses and enabled us to conceptualize three symbolic strategic orientations. These results contribute to a better assessment of the different government approaches to AI governance. This research also contributes to a better understanding of how governments frame their technological and strategic orientations, offering important insights to both the information systems and administration fields.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Loup Richet & Vincent Dutot & Simon Porcher & Tra Tran, 2024. "Policy and Regulation Narratives of Artificial Intelligence : A Comparative Study," Post-Print hal-05064973, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05064973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05064973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.