IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04996911.html

Is AI taking generativity further? An explorative study using the mirroring hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Bordas

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

  • Alexandre Azoulay

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gouthanan Pushpananthan

    (LIU - Linköping University)

Abstract

This paper explores how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) reshapes organizational architectures and creative work through the lens of the mirroring hypothesis. While GenAI systems are often celebrated for their generative capacities, their actual impact on innovation and organizational structures remains underexplored. Drawing on the mirroring hypothesis, which posits a structural isomorphism between technologies, tasks, and knowledge, we propose a conceptual framework mapping how di erent types of GenAI (agnostic, holistic, and specialized) reconfigure organizational architectures. We identify key mechanisms through which GenAI augments, excludes, ports, or substitutes both tasks and knowledge. This conceptual development is supported by an empirical illustration in the healthcare industry, where GenAI was used to accelerate mobile app code migration. The case reveals not only productivity gains but also a deep reconfiguration of developer roles and organizational routines. We formulate hypotheses on how GenAI's architectural nature and the characteristics of organizational knowledge influence task reorganization. Ultimately, we argue that GenAI's generativity lies less in its computational novelty and more in its ability to enable new organizational combinations. This work contributes to understanding the co-evolution of AI systems and organizational design, and extends the mirroring hypothesis to the context of generative technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Bordas & Alexandre Azoulay & Gouthanan Pushpananthan, 2025. "Is AI taking generativity further? An explorative study using the mirroring hypothesis," Post-Print hal-04996911, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04996911
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04996911v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04996911v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lyra J. Colfer & Carliss Y. Baldwin, 2016. "The mirroring hypothesis: theory, evidence, and exceptions," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(5), pages 709-738.
    2. Elina Jaakkola, 2020. "Designing conceptual articles: four approaches," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(1), pages 18-26, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    2. Jasmine D. Haynes & Khalilah Louis Caines, 2024. "Unveiling Curriculum Shadows of Systemic Adversity among Black Youth: Pathways to Eliminate Anti-Black Macroaggressions in Schools," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Xiaoran Zheng & Yuzhuo Cai, 2022. "Transforming Innovation Systems into Innovation Ecosystems: The Role of Public Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, June.
    4. Félicia Saïah & Diego Vega & Harwin de Vries & Joakim Kembro, 2023. "Process modularity, supply chain responsiveness, and moderators: The Médecins Sans Frontières response to the Covid‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(5), pages 1490-1511, May.
    5. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    6. Mehmet Donmez & Anne Norheim‐Hansen, 2024. "Unlocking effective coordination: A knowledge‐based multilevel perspective on supplier integration into product development," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 60(2), pages 22-38, April.
    7. Elizabeth Kassab Sfeir, 2022. "Impact of interpersonal influences on Employee engagement and Psychological contract: Effects of guanxi, wasta, jeitinho, blat and pulling strings," Papers 2209.05592, arXiv.org.
    8. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    9. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Accountability, inclusivity, effectiveness, and leaving no one behind: An exploration of effective governance principles in ensuring clean water and sanitation in South African municipalities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 191-205, December.
    10. Haoyan Li & Hui Jiang, 2024. "Stable Social Knowledge Creation to Solve the Contract Failure Dilemma in International Construction Engineering: A Liquid Crystal Metaphor," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6937-6968, June.
    11. Brown, Ross & Mawson, Suzanne & Rocha, Augusto & Rowe, Alex, 2025. "Looking inside the ‘black box’ of digital firm scaling: An ethnographically informed conceptualisation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. Adel Ben Youssef, 2025. "Twin Transition: Digital Transformation Pathways for Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-28, October.
    13. Samina Karim & Chi‐Hyon Lee & Manuela N. Hoehn‐Weiss, 2023. "Task bottlenecks and resource bottlenecks: A holistic examination of task systems through an organization design lens," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1839-1878, August.
    14. Mukherjee, Debmalya & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Donthu, Naveen, 2022. "Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 101-115.
    15. Tierney, Kieran D. & Oswald Karpen, Ingo & Westberg, Kate, 2022. "Brand meaning and institutional work: The light and dark sides of service employee practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 244-256.
    16. Julien Vastenaekels, 2023. "Degrowth and Capital: Assembling a Power-Centred Theory of Change," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/362596, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    17. Dirk Martignoni & Thomas Keil & Markus Lang, 2020. "Focus in Searching Core–Periphery Structures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 266-286, March.
    18. Mirzaei, Abas & Wilkie, Dean Charles Hugh & Burgess, Amelie Jay, 2024. "Does human value-expressive brand anthropomorphism on social media lead to greater brand competitiveness?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Antonius Setyadi & Suharno Pawirosumarto & Alana Damaris, 2025. "Rethinking Sustainable Operations: A Multi-Level Integration of Circularity, Localization, and Digital Resilience in Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-47, July.
    20. Paris Chrysos, 2018. "Empathy in the business model: how Facebook and Google Maps manage external problem-solving processes," Working Papers halshs-01897205, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04996911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.