Author
Abstract
This article argues that the compulsory economic and ecological transformation of our societies for a sustainable and more equitable world requires appropriate institutional environment and regulation according to the global goal of dealing with growing inequalities and risks. Over the last few decades, the free-market ideology has transformed capitalism into a financialized speculative rent machine, and increased economic fragility and inequality. To date, humanity faces growing environmental concerns and must fight against economic, social and political instabilities. However, research on alternative ways of transforming societies into more livable communities under the burden of climate financing suffers from a lack of appropriate economic and social governance. Achieving society-wide sustainable development goals requires us to rethink our approaches to climate change and transition financing. Climate catastrophes, mostly connected to our way of organizing and managing life on Earth, generate huge systemic risks for economies and people. An alternative way of governing our essential public good, life, is to find out solutions to mitigate harms and adapt economies to this fundamental equation. Our long-lasting issues, -environmental and resource depletion, poverty and inequality, socio-political instabilities, etc.- should be treated within the process of global change: the eco-transition. Dealing with inequalities in the face of growing economic and environmental risks, improving living conditions of citizens and making life affordable for everyone require a global governance of transition. The article then points to necessary institutional reforms that call for innovative approaches to frame our collective goals and to finance the global process of change. Global financial governance and eco-transition should be framed to fostering transformation of markets and institutions to achieve worldwide sustainable development through the provision of two global public goods -financial stability and sustainability (FSS) and economic/ecological sustainability (EES)- both sine qua non for a viable and fairer world.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04947656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.