IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04906059.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ubiquitous Online Workspaces and Unsafe Psychological Climate

Author

Listed:
  • Ribhu Misra

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Sabine Carton

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Emilie Hoareau

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

Building upon the recognized potential of online tools and platforms for fostering collaboration within organizations, contemporary workplaces are increasingly adopting online communities (OCs) as key drivers of learning and knowledge sharing (Hafermalz & Riemer, 2020; Faraj et al., 2016). While for maximizing the effectiveness of these OCs, psychological safety within them needs to be prioritized (Zhang et al., 2010), a critical research gap exists concerning how the inherent online nature of member interactions shapes and influences psychological safety risks. This research gap has been acknowledged by Edmondson & Bransby (2023), who, in their review on psychologically safe climates (PSCs) – state of reduced interpersonal risk – recognize the need for its exploration in remote and hybrid work arrangements considering the impact of remote work. This study aims to address this gap by investigating potential psychological safety risks associated with virtual social dynamics. Our focus is on how the entanglement and/or imbrications of the materiality and the OCs' social subsystem impacts the PSC in these social forms of working. Leveraging the sociomateriality lens (Leonardi, 2013) alongside the four categorizations of factors that shape ‘work experience' proposed by Edmondson & Bransby (2023), we intend to explore if and how the mediated nature of online relationships can potentially contribute to a psychologically unsafe climate within the online workspace. Using this theory as the theoretical lens for this paper offers an understanding of how the interplay of the community's social and material aspects can potentially hinder authentic communication, suppress user engagement, exacerbate stress, and erode inclusivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ribhu Misra & Sabine Carton & Emilie Hoareau, 2024. "Ubiquitous Online Workspaces and Unsafe Psychological Climate," Post-Print hal-04906059, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04906059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04906059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.