Author
Listed:
- Joël Spiroux de Vendômois
(CRIIGEN - Comité de Recherche et d’Information Indépendantes sur le génie Génétique)
- Jean-Paul Bourdineaud
(MFP - Microbiologie Fondamentale et Pathogénicité - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Arnaud Apoteker
(CRIIGEN - Comité de Recherche et d’Information Indépendantes sur le génie Génétique)
- Nicolas Defarge
(ETH Zürich - Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich])
- Emilie Gaillard
(IEP Rennes - Sciences Po Rennes - Institut d'études politiques de Rennes)
- Corinne Lepage
(Ministère de l'environnement - Ministère de l'Environnement)
- Jacques Testart
(CRIIGEN - Comité de Recherche et d’Information Indépendantes sur le génie Génétique)
- Christian Vélot
(Pôle Risques MRSH - Pôle Risques, qualité et environnement durable (MRSH) - MRSH - Maison de la recherche en sciences humaines - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CRIIGEN - Comité de Recherche et d’Information Indépendantes sur le génie Génétique)
Abstract
Repeated health and environmental scandals, the loss of biodiversity and the recent burst of chronic diseases constantly remind us the inability of public authorities and risk assessment agencies to protect health and the environment. After reviewing the main shortcomings of our evaluation system of chemicals and new technologies, supported by some concrete examples, we develop a number of proposals to reform both the risk assessment agencies and the evaluation processes. We especially propose the establishment of an independent structure, a High Authority of Expertise, supervising, either at European level or at national level, all the evaluation agencies, and ensuring the transparency, the methodology and the deontology of the expertise. In addition to modifying the evaluation protocols, both in their nature and in their content, especially in order to adapt them to current pollutants such as endocrine disruptors, we propose a reform of the expertise processes based on transparency, contradiction, and greater democracy, including close collaboration between the institutional and scientific parties on the one hand and the whole civil society on the other. All the proposals we make are inspired by the desire to prevent, through appropriate mechanisms, the human, health, ecological, but also economic consequences of contemporary technological choices.
Suggested Citation
Joël Spiroux de Vendômois & Jean-Paul Bourdineaud & Arnaud Apoteker & Nicolas Defarge & Emilie Gaillard & Corinne Lepage & Jacques Testart & Christian Vélot, 2021.
"Trans-disciplinary diagnosis for an in-depth reform of regulatory expertise in the field of environmental toxicology and security,"
Post-Print
hal-04723708, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04723708
DOI: 10.1007/s43188-020-00075-w
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04723708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.