IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04703339.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do cooperatives cope better? A survival analyses of French agricultural cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Justine Valette

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School, Labex Entreprendre - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Paul Amadieu

    (UM - Université de Montpellier, MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School, Labex Entreprendre - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Patrick Sentis

    (UM - Université de Montpellier)

Abstract

This paper studies the survival of French agricultural cooperatives. Although usually studied from a neoclassical perspective, they are considered inefficient despite several reports emphasising their resilience. Are cooperatives more resistant than traditional businesses? To answer this question, we use a discrete-time survival model. Our results reveal that ownership structure influences survival: cooperatives tend to merge more than traditional companies, but they are less likely to exit by liquidation. Traditional financial ratios cannot be used to fully explain the capacity of cooperatives for resistance.

Suggested Citation

  • Justine Valette & Paul Amadieu & Patrick Sentis, 2017. "Do cooperatives cope better? A survival analyses of French agricultural cooperatives," Post-Print hal-04703339, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04703339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04703339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.