IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04434040.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Knowledge-Brokering Activities as Enactors of Innovative Constructive Deviance in Open R&D Projects

Author

Listed:
  • S. Larif
  • M. Essid
  • S. Castellano

    (Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie)

  • I. Khelladi

Abstract

Despite the two sides of deviant behaviors and the fact that knowledge brokers are sometimes presented in a negative light due to their unique position, this article unveils from an innovation perspective how these two intricate individual-level concepts bring positive outcomes in complex environments. While previous work has highlighted the positive impact of constructive workplace deviance on organizations and their members, research on the antecedents of such deviance is scarce. We use knowledge brokers as an unexplored and pertinent means of enacting innovative constructive deviance. Indeed, knowledge brokering supports innovation by connecting, recombining, and transferring disconnected pools of ideas. A case study of a high-tech company was conducted. We focused on three B2C and B2B co-creation projects as one of the main open innovation strategies. The results suggest that knowledge-brokering activities with customers or partner firms enact innovative constructive deviance in different ways and accelerate creativity and innovation within the organization. This paper contributes to the debate on deviant behaviors and brokering activities within the open innovation paradigm. We enrich the microfoundational perspective of the open innovation literature, shed light on the determinants of innovative constructive deviance, and provide empirical evidence of the relationship between brokering activities and deviant behavior. On a managerial level, the findings suggest that knowledge-brokering activities among multiple stakeholders foster innovative behaviors within co-creation projects. \textcopyright 2023 RADMA and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Larif & M. Essid & S. Castellano & I. Khelladi, 2023. "Knowledge-Brokering Activities as Enactors of Innovative Constructive Deviance in Open R&D Projects," Post-Print hal-04434040, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04434040
    DOI: 10.1111/radm.12651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04434040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.