IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04410370.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Long Run and Short Run Pesticide Inefficiencies in the French Wine Farming Sector
[Inefficacité à long terme et à court terme des pesticides dans le secteur viticole français]

Author

Listed:
  • K Hervé Dakpo

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Laure Latruffe

    (INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, BSE - Bordeaux Sciences Economiques - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Yann Desjeux

    (INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, BSE - Bordeaux Sciences Economiques - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

While the systematic use of pesticides on farms is associated with several negative impacts on human health and the environment -in particular biodiversity, many policy initiatives strive to provide the right incentives to shift agricultural production towards more environmentally friendly practices. For instance, at the EU level, the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Directive aims to reduce by 50% the use and the risks associated with chemical pesticides by 2030. The case of pesticide use in the French wine sector is quite controversial as vine plants are the most heavily treated crops in France. In France, vineyards account for about 3% of agricultural area but use 20% of the total pesticides. In parallel, New World producers are increasingly greening their wineries, while French wine growers are seen as laggards. At the policy level, in 2018, the French national policy progamme ‘Ecophyto II+' sets more ambitious targets than its EU counterpart by aiming at a 50% reduction of pesticide use by 2025. The effectiveness of pesticide policies depends, on the one hand, on the existence of viable technical solutions that do not compromise yields and profit and that are acceptable to farmers, and on the other hand, on how dependent farms are on pesticides. In this work, we focus on the latter point by relating pesticide dependency to a technological locked-in characterized by self-reinforcing mechanisms, which prevent the adoption of other beneficial alternatives to pesticides even though they may exist. A peculiar feature of technological locked-in is the existence of structural/persistent inefficiencies. Our goal in this work is to disentangle long-run (structural/persistent) and short-run (transient) inefficiencies in pesticide use in the case of French wine growers. To this aim, we estimate a four-error component stochastic frontier that accounts for farm heterogeneity. Two different models are estimated. The first one is a pesticide input requirement technology, and for robustness, a variable input distance function is estimated as the second model. Both models are estimated in two steps. In the first step, a GMM estimation is conducted to deal with endogeneity issues; in the second step, the error components are estimated. The application is to bookkeeping and structural data from a representative sample of French wine growers between 2002 and 2021.

Suggested Citation

  • K Hervé Dakpo & Laure Latruffe & Yann Desjeux, 2023. "Long Run and Short Run Pesticide Inefficiencies in the French Wine Farming Sector [Inefficacité à long terme et à court terme des pesticides dans le secteur viticole français]," Post-Print hal-04410370, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04410370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04410370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.