IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04408864.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A new Form for the Evaluation of Scientific Articles under Peer Review
[Un nouveau format pour l’évaluation des articles de recherche dans le processus d’examen par les pairs]

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Sabaj Meruane

    (USERENA - Universidad de La Serena)

  • Carlos González-Vergara

    (UC - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile)

  • Germán Varas Espinoza

    (USERENA - Universidad de La Serena)

  • Alvaro Pina-Stranger

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In this article a new form for the evaluation of scientific articles under peer review is presented. This proposal is based on some empirical observations with respect to the process through which scientific knowledge is built. The principles underlying this proposal are simplicity, agility and clarity in the feedback for authors. Some of the weaknesses of peer review could be addressed by applying this new procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Sabaj Meruane & Carlos González-Vergara & Germán Varas Espinoza & Alvaro Pina-Stranger, 2015. "A new Form for the Evaluation of Scientific Articles under Peer Review [Un nouveau format pour l’évaluation des articles de recherche dans le processus d’examen par les pairs]," Post-Print hal-04408864, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04408864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04408864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.