IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04279678.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing pro-poor innovation acceptance by income segments

Author

Listed:
  • Md Rajibul Hasan

    (ESC [Rennes] - ESC Rennes School of Business)

  • S.M. Riad Shams

    (Newcastle University Business School)

  • Mizan Rahman

    (Lincoln Univ, Lincoln Business Sch, Lincoln LN6 7TA, England - affiliation inconnue)

  • Shamim Ehsanul Haque

    (BRAC University)

Abstract

Purpose To enhance the understanding of the moderating influence of different bottom of the pyramid (BOP) income segments on the antecedents of pro-poor innovation acceptance. Design/methodology/approach In this study, 320 BOP consumers with a range of low-to-moderate literacy and low-income levels were used as a convenience non-probability sample for undertaking quantitative analyses. Findings Only the influence of perceived usefulness on intention is moderated by income segments, such that the effect will be stronger for low-income BOP segment. Moreover, the influences of relative advantage, compatibility and observability on intention are moderated by income segments. Practical implications This empirical work has considerable private sector and public policy implications for companies and government designing/selling products for millions of poor people in developing and emerging economies. Originality/value This study contributes originally to knowledge in the subject area as there are very few studies that clearly and systematically analyse the key antecedents influencing the adoption intention of pro-poor technological innovations in the BOP market.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Rajibul Hasan & S.M. Riad Shams & Mizan Rahman & Shamim Ehsanul Haque, 2020. "Analysing pro-poor innovation acceptance by income segments," Post-Print hal-04279678, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04279678
    DOI: 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04279678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.