IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03988987.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Land grabbing and land reform: a conceptual proposition

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrdad Vahabi

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - LABEX ICCA - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UPCité - Université Paris Cité - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Université Sorbonne Paris Nord)

Abstract

This paper investigates the political and economic dimension of land allocation. Dichotomies such as land grabbing versus pro-poor land reform fails to fully grasp economic transformations that are at play – the type of revenue (rent versus profit) and the type of production (crop-sharing for self-subsistence versus wage relation for market-oriented production). We propose a conceptual reformulation through ideal types and re-examine the historical case of the ‘White Revolution' in Iran. Land reform refers to a process of land appropriation in the interest of those who do not have concentrated economic or political power that might lead to a separation of property from sovereignty. On the other hand, land grabbing is the use of coercive means to appropriate land in the interest of those who have concentrated power leading to a fusion of sovereignty and property. This conceptual proposition highlights how deeper theoretical conceptions of the state and property rights constraint the understanding of land reform and land grabbing. While contractualist or extended contractualist perspectives of the state bear limitations, an appropriative perspective drawing from Public Choice theory (Boettke & Leeson, 2015; Cai et al., 2020; Vahabi, 2016) could allow to explore tenure security not only beyond the state, but also repealing it.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrdad Vahabi, 2023. "Land grabbing and land reform: a conceptual proposition," Post-Print hal-03988987, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03988987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03988987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.