IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03888455.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Female cooperative labour networks in hunter–gatherers and horticulturalists

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas S. Kraft

    (University of Utah)

  • Daniel Cummings

    (Chapman University)

  • Vivek Venkataraman

    (TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Sarah Alami

    (Mohammed VI Polytechnic University)

  • Bret A. Beheim

    (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology [Leipzig] - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft)

  • Paul L. Hooper

    (Chapman University)

  • Edmond Seabright

    (Mohammed VI Polytechnic University)

  • Benjamin C. Trumble

    (ASU - Arizona State University [Tempe])

  • Jonathan Stieglitz

    (TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Hillard Kaplan

    (Chapman University)

  • Karen L. Endicott

    (Dartmouth College [Hanover])

  • Kirk M. Endicott

    (Dartmouth College [Hanover])

  • Michael Gurven

    (UC Santa Barbara - University of California [Santa Barbara] - UC - University of California)

Abstract

Cooperation in food acquisition is a hallmark of the human species. Given that costs and benefits of cooperation vary among production regimes and work activities, the transition from hunting-and-gathering to agriculture is likely to have reshaped the structure of cooperative subsistence networks. Hunter–gatherers often forage in groups and are generally more interdependent and experience higher short-term food acquisition risk than horticulturalists, suggesting that cooperative labour should be more widespread and frequent for hunter–gatherers. Here we compare female cooperative labour networks of Batek hunter–gatherers of Peninsular Malaysia and Tsimane forager–horticulturalists of Bolivia. We find that Batek foraging results in high daily variation in labour partnerships, facilitating frequent cooperation in diffuse networks comprised of kin and non-kin. By contrast, Tsimane horticulture involves more restricted giving and receiving of labour, confined mostly to spouses and primary or distant kin. Tsimane women also interact with few individuals in the context of hunting/fishing activities and forage mainly with spouses and primary kin. These differences give rise to camp- or village-level networks that are more modular (have more substructure when partitioned) among Tsimane horticulturalists. Our findings suggest that subsistence activities shape the formation and extent of female social networks, particularly with respect to connections with other women and non-kin. We discuss the implications of restricted female labour networks in the context of gender relations, power dynamics and the adoption of farming in humans.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas S. Kraft & Daniel Cummings & Vivek Venkataraman & Sarah Alami & Bret A. Beheim & Paul L. Hooper & Edmond Seabright & Benjamin C. Trumble & Jonathan Stieglitz & Hillard Kaplan & Karen L. Endicot, 2023. "Female cooperative labour networks in hunter–gatherers and horticulturalists," Post-Print hal-03888455, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03888455
    DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03888455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.