IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03571138.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluation des politiques publiques : faut-il de l'interdisciplinarité ?

Author

Listed:
  • Etienne Wasmer

    (ECON - Département d'économie (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

L'évaluation des politiques publiques est devenue un champ de recherche très actif en sciences sociales, dont les travaux influencent de plus en plus les décisions publiques. Le choix de la méthodologie d'évaluation se pose dès lors avec d'autant plus d'acuité qu'elle n'est pas toujours neutre. Plus précisément, nous discutons des avantages et des inconvénients de l'interdisciplinarité lorsqu'il s'agit de porter un diagnostic qui soit à la fois juste, de portée opérationnelle, exact empiriquement et rigoureux scientifiquement. Des travaux de psychologie qui ont étudié la capacité prédictive des experts ont conclu que la spécialisation des experts semblait réduire leurs capacités prédictives. Nous en tirons des implications pour l'évaluation et passons en revue les coûts de transaction générés par les échanges interdisciplinaires.

Suggested Citation

  • Etienne Wasmer, 2014. "Evaluation des politiques publiques : faut-il de l'interdisciplinarité ?," Post-Print hal-03571138, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03571138
    DOI: 10.3917/ecop.204.0193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03571138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.