IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03228369.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Risk Perception & Behaviour Survey of Surveyors. Risk-SoS 2020 Preliminary results

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Rufat

    (IUF - Institut Universitaire de France - M.E.N.E.S.R. - Ministère de l'Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, MRTE - EA 4112 - Laboratoire Mobilités, Réseaux, Territoires, Environnements - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université)

  • Iuliana Armaş

    (UniBuc - University of Bucharest)

  • Wouter Botzen

    (Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM) - VU - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam])

  • Emeline Comby

    (EVS - Environnement, Ville, Société - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Mines Saint-Étienne MSE - École des Mines de Saint-Étienne - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - INSA Lyon - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon - Université de Lyon - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - ENTPE - École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État - ENSAL - École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Lyon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mariana de Brito

    (UFZ - Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung = Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research)

  • Alexander Fekete

    (THK - Institute of Rescue Engineering and Civil Protection, University of Applied Sciences Cologne)

  • Christian Kuhlicke

    (UFZ - Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung = Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research)

  • Peter Robinson

    (Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM) - VU - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam])

Abstract

One of the key challenges in risk, vulnerability and resilience is how to address the role of risk perceptions and how perceptions influence behaviour. A central question is why people still fail to act in an adaptive manner to reduce future losses, even when there are ever richer risk information provided by several communication channels (e.g. websites, social media, mobile applications, television, and print news). The current fragmentation of the field makes it an uphill battle to cross-validate the results of the current collection of independent case studies. This, in turn, hinders comparability and transferability across scales and contexts, and hampers giving recommendations for policy and risk management. While we obviously cannot all run the very same questionnaire or focus groups because we have different research interests, our ability to work together and build cumulative knowledge could be significantly improved by having: (1) a common list of minimal requirements to compare studies and surveys, (2) shared criteria to address context-specific aspects of countries and regions, (3) a selection of survey questions or themes allowing for comparability and long-term monitoring. Following the First European Conference on Risk Perception, Behaviour, Management and Response , the aim of the Risk Perception & Behaviour Survey of Surveyors (SoS) was to provide answers to move towards this direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Rufat & Iuliana Armaş & Wouter Botzen & Emeline Comby & Mariana de Brito & Alexander Fekete & Christian Kuhlicke & Peter Robinson, 2021. "Risk Perception & Behaviour Survey of Surveyors. Risk-SoS 2020 Preliminary results," Post-Print hal-03228369, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03228369
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03228369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03228369/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03228369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.