IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03048816.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The asymmetry hypothesis between entrepreneurs and employees: standard or exception in the history of economic analysis?
[L’hypothèse d’asymétrie entre entrepreneurs et salariés : norme ou exception dans l’histoire de l’analyse économique ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Piluso

    (CERTOP - Centre d'Etude et de Recherche Travail Organisation Pouvoir - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Thomas Ruellou

    (PHARE - Philosophie, Histoire et Analyse des Représentations Économiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that from a history of economic thought perspective, the institutional hypothesis of asymmetry between entrepreneurs and employees, which implies that the employment level is determined by entrepreneurs alone, is particularly common. It would therefore constitute a standard, far from what orthodox economists and most economics textbooks suggest by presupposing that the level of employment would be jointly determined by supply and demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Piluso & Thomas Ruellou, 2020. "The asymmetry hypothesis between entrepreneurs and employees: standard or exception in the history of economic analysis? [L’hypothèse d’asymétrie entre entrepreneurs et salariés : norme ou exceptio," Post-Print hal-03048816, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03048816
    DOI: 10.4000/interventionseconomiques.11708
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03048816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03048816/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.11708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unvoluntary unemployment; restricted Say law; wage; asymetric salary relationship.; chômage involontaire; loi de Say restreinte; rapport salarial asymétrique; salaire;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03048816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.