Author
Listed:
- Nada Matta
(Tech-CICO - TECHnologies pour la Coopération, l’Interaction et les COnnaissances dans les collectifs - ICD - Institut Charles Delaunay - UTT - Université de Technologie de Troyes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
- Guillaume Ducellier
(Tech-CICO - TECHnologies pour la Coopération, l’Interaction et les COnnaissances dans les collectifs - ICD - Institut Charles Delaunay - UTT - Université de Technologie de Troyes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Abstract
This chapter discusses how to capture knowledge from cooperative decision making. In computer supported cooperative work (CSCW), there is a lot of work in design rationale as a support of cooperative decision making. Methods in CSCW can be classified in two principal categories: decision‐making‐driven representation and problem‐solving dynamics representation. When studying decision‐making in cooperative activity, negotiation and conflict management are the main tasks to deal with. Three types of methods can be distinguished in conflict management: prevention, argumentation, conflict detection and conflict solving methods. Traceability of design rationale must be first integrated in the decision‐making process and second offers techniques that help to keep track of collaborative decision‐making from meetings, interactions, etc. A product life cycle management (PLM) platform allows managing the product data along its life cycle process: specification, design and manufacturing and requires efficient traceability functionalities, often based on the definition of standards.
Suggested Citation
Nada Matta & Guillaume Ducellier, 2016.
"Traceability and Structuring of Decision‐Making,"
Post-Print
hal-02878711, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02878711
DOI: 10.1002/9781119292142.ch3
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02878711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.