IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02548993.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Disparities in bone density across contemporary Amazonian forager‐horticulturalists: Cross‐population comparison of the Tsimane and Shuar

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Stieglitz

    (TSE-R - Toulouse School of Economics - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Felicia C. Madimenos

    (QC - Queens College [CUNY] - CUNY - City University of New York [New York])

  • Melissa Liebert

    (Northern Arizona University [Flagstaff])

  • Tara J. Cepon-Robins

    (University of Colorado [Colorado Springs])

  • Samuel Urlacher

    (Baylor University)

  • J. Josh Snodgrass

    (University of Oregon [Eugene])

  • Lawrence Sugiyama

    (University of Oregon [Eugene])

Abstract

This study investigates bone density across the life course among Bolivian Tsimane and Ecuadorian Shuar of Amazonia. Both groups are rural, high‐fertility forager‐horticulturalists, with high lifetime physical activity levels. We test whether Tsimane and Shuar bone density patterns are different from each other, and if both groups are characterized by lower osteoporosis risk compared to U.S. references.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Stieglitz & Felicia C. Madimenos & Melissa Liebert & Tara J. Cepon-Robins & Samuel Urlacher & J. Josh Snodgrass & Lawrence Sugiyama, 2020. "Disparities in bone density across contemporary Amazonian forager‐horticulturalists: Cross‐population comparison of the Tsimane and Shuar," Post-Print hal-02548993, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02548993
    DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02548993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.