IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02532185.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Changing from Unrestricted Access to Sustainable Abstraction Management Regimes: Lessons Learnt from France and Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Daniel Rinaudo

    (BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM))

  • Steve Barnett

    (Government of South Australia)

  • Cameron Holley

    (UNSW - University of New South Wales [Sydney])

Abstract

This concluding chapter compares the important features of the groundwater policy and management approaches that have been implemented in France and Aus-tralia and draws lessons that may be relevant to other countries who are implementing groundwater management regimes. To support the comparison, the chapter looks at six main stages of the policy development process: 1) political awareness raising; 2) increasing the groundwater knowledge base; 3) defining and allocating water use rights; 4) defining sustainability objectives and setting extraction limits; 5) returning over allocated and overused groundwater systems to sustainable levels of extraction; and 6) enforcement policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Daniel Rinaudo & Steve Barnett & Cameron Holley, 2020. "Changing from Unrestricted Access to Sustainable Abstraction Management Regimes: Lessons Learnt from France and Australia," Post-Print hal-02532185, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02532185
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_27
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02532185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02532185/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/978-3-030-32766-8_27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    political awareness raising; groundwater knowledge base; water use rights; allocation; extraction limts; enforcement;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02532185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.