IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02358322.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La rationalité des agents économiques va-t-elle toujours à l'encontre de la coopération ? Le jeu de la poule mouillée

Author

Listed:
  • Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin

    (CREAM - Centre de Recherche en Economie Appliquée à la Mondialisation - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

  • Shyama V. Ramani

Abstract

This paper interests itself in a ?game of chicken? involving heterogeneous players. More precisely, it examines the conditions for the initiation and engagement of cooperative agreements between two types of economic agents: (i) those with a standard rationality (maximization of own payoffs); and (ii) those with a preference for cooperative behaviour (after contract initiation). Each agent knows his own ?type? but is ignorant of the ?type? of his partner in the game. However the proportion of the two types of players in the population is common knowledge. This analysis concerns a non-repeated game under incomplete information without the possibility of eliminating opportunism through contracts. We show that higher the proportion of ?rational? individuals in the population, higher the incentives for these players to cooperate. A minimum of ?rational? agents is necessary to induce cooperation from this population group. The degree of cooperation in the entire population is however independent of the initial proportion of ?rational? agents being dictated by the payoff configurations.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Marie-Laure Cabon-Dhersin & Shyama V. Ramani, 2007. "La rationalité des agents économiques va-t-elle toujours à l'encontre de la coopération ? Le jeu de la poule mouillée," Post-Print hal-02358322, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02358322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02358322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.