IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02116172.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can safety training contribute to enhancing safety?

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Bieder

    (ENAC - Ecole Nationale de l'Aviation Civile)

Abstract

Training has always been an obvious response to any operational issue and safety issues are no exception. Further to an accident, training, and more specifically safety training, almost always forms part of the recommendations. More than that, safety training has always been considered by many as one of the major pillars for ensuring the safety of hazardous activities. This is the case in regulatory requirements as well as in many internal safety policies. Although this seems to make sense intuitively, intuition is not always of sound advice when it comes to safety. In reality, safety training conveys a number of implicit assumptions as to what contributes to making the operation of an organization safe. These assumptions, once made explicit, become debatable. However, unravelling them makes it possible to examine potential ways forward to reach beyond what seems to be the current safety training escalation dead-end.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Bieder, 2018. "Can safety training contribute to enhancing safety?," Post-Print hal-02116172, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02116172
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65527-7_12
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://enac.hal.science/hal-02116172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://enac.hal.science/hal-02116172/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/978-3-319-65527-7_12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Work practices; Regulatory requirements; Compliance; Safety performance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02116172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.