IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02066561.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparaison De La Maitrise Des Erreurs Systematiques A Travers Plusieurs Secteurs D'Activite
[A Cross-Domain Comparison Of Systematic Errors Control Strategies]

Author

Listed:
  • Bertrand Ricque

    (SAFRAN Group)

  • Philippe Baufreton

    (SAFRAN Group)

  • Jean-Paul Blanquart

    (Airbus Defence and Space [Toulouse])

  • Jean-Louis Boulanger

    (CERTIFER)

Abstract

All domain specific safety frameworks account for controlling introduction of systematic errors and mitigating their effect on system mission and environment. However they exhibit differences according to application sectors. The position of safety standards regarding systematic failures quantification is also variable and reveals significant differences deserving some further analysis. In this paper, we analyse how different standards account, or not, for the contribution of systematic errors to overall failures rates. We describe how different strategies for systematic error control have an impact on system engineering. We expose the underlying approach of each sector and explore the specific aspects of systematic errors control at item level versus system level.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertrand Ricque & Philippe Baufreton & Jean-Paul Blanquart & Jean-Louis Boulanger, 2018. "Comparaison De La Maitrise Des Erreurs Systematiques A Travers Plusieurs Secteurs D'Activite [A Cross-Domain Comparison Of Systematic Errors Control Strategies]," Post-Print hal-02066561, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02066561
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02066561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02066561/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02066561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.