IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02053812.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness?

Author

Listed:
  • Issam Laguir

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Raffaele Staglianò

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • Jamal Elbaz

    (Ecole Supérieure de Technologie d'Agadir - Université Ibn Zohr [Agadir])

Abstract

Recent years have seen a considerable increase in the literature concerning the separate areas of corporate social responsibility and corporate tax aggressiveness. However, comparatively little scholarly attention has been paid to the link between the two. This paper examines how the different activities of corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness. A structural model was tested using partial least squares regression to determine whether the relationships between corporate social responsibility dimensions and tax aggressiveness are positive or negative. Based on a sample of French publicly listed firms, the results indicate that a firm's tax aggressiveness depends on the nature of its corporate social responsibility activities. Notably, the study demonstrates that greater the activity in the social dimension of corporate social responsibility, the lower the level of corporate tax aggressiveness will be, whereas high activity in the economic dimension is associated with a high level of tax aggressiveness. These results extend the prior literature concerning the relationship between corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness and suggest that the nature of the relationship, whether negative or positive, tends to differ across the corporate social responsibility dimensions. Overall, the study provides unique insight into the association between CSR activities and corporate tax aggressiveness. Indeed, the paper strongly supports the current literature and argues that the dimensions of corporate social responsibility should not be aggregated into a single measure because interesting and explanatory information is lost when such a method is used, especially with regard to an issue like corporate tax aggressiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Issam Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò & Jamal Elbaz, 2015. "Does corporate social responsibility affect corporate tax aggressiveness?," Post-Print hal-02053812, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02053812
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrizia Gazzola & Audrey Paterson & Stefano Amelio & Daniele Grechi & Stefano Cristina, 2023. "The role of individual social responsibility and corporate social responsibility in the tax fraud war: A comparison between the priorities of Italian and Romanian consumers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2265-2277, September.
    2. Laszlo Goerke, 2021. "Tax Evasion by Firms," IAAEU Discussion Papers 202104, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
    3. Francesco Scarpa & Silvana Signori, 2023. "Understanding corporate tax responsibility: a systematic literature review," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(7), pages 179-201, June.
    4. Tânia Menezes Montenegro, 2021. "Tax Evasion, Corporate Social Responsibility and National Governance: A Country-Level Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Laszlo Goerke, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 21(2), pages 310-331, April.
    6. Jie Li & Peng Mao & Hui Liu & Jiawei Wei & Hongyang Li & Jingfeng Yuan, 2020. "Key Factors Influencing Low-Carbon Behaviors of Staff in Star-Rated Hotels—An Empirical Study of Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, November.
    7. Andrey B. Ankudinov & Idelia R. Badykova, 2020. "Empirical analysis of the relationship between the costs of corporate social responsibility policy implementation and Russian companies’ financial performance," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(2), pages 16-26, April.
    8. Karima Lajnef & Kawther Dhifi, 2024. "Integrating Reporting Bridge, the Gap Between CSR Performance and Tax Avoidance Relationship? Insights from South Africa," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 41-59.
    9. Eva López‐González & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Emma García‐Meca, 2019. "Does corporate social responsibility affect tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 819-831, July.
    10. Hongfeng Sun & Meng Yang & Lidan Li & Chang Liu, 2023. "Corporate Charitable Donations, Earnings Performance and Tax Avoidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Shih-Shen Chen & Chien-Shu Tsai & Chen Chen, 2022. "Quid Pro Quo CSR and Trade Liberalization in a Bilateral Monopoly," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, May.
    12. Antonio Fabio Forgione & Issam Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò, 2020. "Effect of corporate social responsibility scores on bank efficiency: The moderating role of institutional context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2094-2106, September.
    13. Ahmed A. Sarhan, 2024. "Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance: the effect of shareholding structure—evidence from the UK," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Uyar, Ali & Kilic, Merve & Schneider, Friedrich, 2021. "Ethical behavior, auditing strength, and tax evasion: A worldwide perspective," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Issam Laguir & Rebecca Stekelorum & Lamia Laguir & Raffaele Staglianò, 2021. "Managing corporate social responsibility in the bank sector: A fuzzy and disaggregated approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1324-1334, July.
    16. Saif Ur Rehman & Yacoub Haider Hamdan, 2023. "Founding-Family Firms and CSR Performance in the Emerging Economy of India: A Socio-Emotional Wealth Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Osman Issah & Lúcia Lima Rodrigues, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness: A Scientometric Analysis of the Existing Literature to Map the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Abdelfattah, Tarek & Aboud, Ahmed, 2020. "Tax avoidance, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility: The case of the Egyptian capital market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    19. Luca Gandullia & Stefano Piserà, 2020. "Do income taxes affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from European‐listed companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1017-1027, March.
    20. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas & Fausto Cavallaro & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Ahmad Jusoh & Habib Zare, 2017. "Application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Solve Environmental Sustainability Problems: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-65, October.
    21. Fallan, Even & Fallan, Lars, 2019. "Corporate tax behaviour and environmental disclosure: Strategic trade-offs across elements of CSR?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02053812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.