IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02049456.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Saïd Yami

    (Kedge Business School [Talence], MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

  • André Nemeh

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

Abstract

Prior research highlighted the prevalence of coopetition as a strategy for innovation in high-tech industries for several reasons but the link between forms of coopetition and innovation is still understudied. In order to fill this gap in the literature, this study attempts to answer the following question: which form of coopetition favors which type of innovation? The results of an embedded case study approach of five Celtic-Plus projects (European Eureka Program) in the wireless telecommunication sector show that two forms of coopetition exist: multiple and dyadic. While multiple coopetition is successfully pursued for radical innovation, dyadic coopetition is more suitable for incremental innovation. Different innovation objectives lead to different levels of value creation/appropriation tensions between coopetitors. In order for competitors to pursue radical or incremental innovation successfully, different levels of social capital related to different choices of partners are needed. The role of social capital levels as a moderating factor between value creation/appropriation tensions and innovation type is discussed in detail. The study proposes a conceptual model that links coopetition strategy motives to the types of coopetition and their results in terms of radical or incremental innovation. Finally, a framework that helps firms to balance between multiple/dyadic–vertical/horizontal collaboration according to the levels of value creation/appropriation tensions and social capital is proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Saïd Yami & André Nemeh, 2014. "Organizing coopetition for innovation: The case of wireless telecommunication sector in Europe," Post-Print hal-02049456, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02049456
    DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihaela STEFAN & Andreea MARIN-PANTELESCU & Mirela TÃœRKES, 2018. "Strategic Management Of The Romanian Telecommunication Services," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 451-461, November.
    2. Julien Granata & Katherine Gundolf & Pierre Marques, 2021. "Managing Paradoxical Tensions in a Coopetitive Context Horizontal Multiple-Firm Coopetition [Gérer les tensions paradoxales dans un contexte coopétitif : la coopétition horizontale multi-entreprise," Post-Print hal-03619371, HAL.
    3. Ming-Chao Wang & Ja-Shen Chen, 2022. "Driving coopetition strategy to service innovation: the moderating role of coopetition recognition," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1471-1501, July.
    4. Xiao-Bing Zhang & Che-Hung Lin & Kou-Chang Chung & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Rung-Tai Wu, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing and Co-Opetition: Turning Absorptive Capacity into Effectiveness in Consumer Electronics Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Fonseca Cristina & Meneses Raquel, 2020. "Motivations for Coopetition Strategies between Banks and Fintechs," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 282-293, July.
    6. Wenwen Shen & Yuankun Nie & Chao Long & Zibo Song & Qian Zhang & Decai Tang, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Collaborative Value Co-Creation of Enterprise–Science Community: A Case Study Based on the Green Brand Maoduoli," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Isidoro Romero & Igone Porto Gómez & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2019. "‘Cookpetition’: Do restaurants coopete to innovate?," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(6), pages 904-922, September.
    8. Minwei Chen & Cixian Lv & Xinghua Wang & Linlin Li & Peijin Yang, 2023. "A Critical Review of Studies on Coopetition in Educational Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Ritala, Paavo & Huizingh, Eelko & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Wijbenga, Paul, 2017. "Tensions in R&D networks: Implications for knowledge search and integration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 311-322.
    10. Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Frédéric Le Roy, 2016. "Why firms implement Coopetitive-Project Teams?," Post-Print hal-02101071, HAL.
    11. Yadav, Neetu & Kumar, Roopesh & Malik, Ashish, 2022. "Global developments in coopetition research: A bibliometric analysis of research articles published between 2010 and 2020," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 495-508.
    12. Bacon, Emily & Williams, Michael D. & Davies, Gareth, 2020. "Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 307-316.
    13. Corbo, Leonardo & Kraus, Sascha & Vlačić, Božidar & Dabić, Marina & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano M., 2023. "Coopetition and innovation: A review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Chen, Fu Chen & Indiran, Logaiswari Indiran & Abdul Kohar, Umar Haiyat Abdul Kohar, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation (DI) and Chief Executive Officer(CEO): A synthetic literature review," MPRA Paper 119321, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Oct 2023.
    15. Dorn, Stefanie & Schweiger, Bastian & Albers, Sascha, 2016. "Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 484-500.
    16. Fanny Simon & Alberic Tellier, 2020. "How coopetition influences the development of a dominant design: evidence from the pinball industry," Post-Print hal-02933068, HAL.
    17. Zhong, Qi & Sun, Yaowu, 2020. "The more the better? Relational governance in platforms and the role of appropriability mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 62-73.
    18. Magali Malherbe, 2016. "The evolution of coopetitive architecture in the emergence of an ecosystem," Post-Print halshs-01580088, HAL.
    19. Czakon, Wojciech & Niemand, Thomas & Gast, Johanna & Kraus, Sascha & Frühstück, Lisa, 2020. "Designing coopetition for radical innovation: An experimental study of managers' preferences for developing self-driving electric cars," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Vladimir Vanyushyn & Maria Bengtsson & Malin H. Näsholm & Håkan Boter, 2018. "International coopetition for innovation: Are the benefits worth the challenges?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 535-557, March.
    21. Norat Roig‐Tierno & Sascha Kraus & Sonia Cruz, 2018. "The relation between coopetition and innovation/entrepreneurship," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 379-383, March.
    22. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Violeta Radulescu & Stefan Alexandru Ionescu, 2018. "What Makes Coopetition Successful? An Inter-Organizational Side Analysis on Coopetition Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    23. Raza-Ullah, Tatbeeq & Kostis, Angelos, 2020. "Do trust and distrust in coopetition matter to performance?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 367-376.
    24. Frédéric Le Roy & Sea Matilda Bez & Johanna Gast, 2021. "Unpacking the management of Oligo-coopetition strategies in the absence of a moderating third party," Post-Print hal-03349671, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02049456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.