IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02015918.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Equity crowdfunding: does it impact start-up valuation?
[Le financement par crowdfunding. Quelles spécificités pour l'évaluation des entreprises ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Véronique Bessiere

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

  • Eric Stephany

    (MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UM2 - Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School)

Abstract

Crowdfunding plays an increasing role for seed financing. Compared to traditional ways of fundraising, it introduces two new stakeholders: the platform and the crowd. Both are involved in the selection and the valuation of entrepreneurial projects. This article examines their role and the ensuing valuation process. We discuss the legitimacy of the crowd to assess a financial valuation. Our analysis underlines two kinds of phenomenon. First, the valuation process becomes less and less financial and more affect-driven. We observe an evolution towards a "definancialization" of valuation. Second, the governance of startups is also evolving compared to the one exerted in traditional context in particular by business angels.

Suggested Citation

  • Véronique Bessiere & Eric Stephany, 2014. "Equity crowdfunding: does it impact start-up valuation? [Le financement par crowdfunding. Quelles spécificités pour l'évaluation des entreprises ?]," Post-Print hal-02015918, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02015918
    DOI: 10.3166/rfg.242.149-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02015918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.