IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01889483.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Competing institutional logics and the evolution of organizational routines
[Confrontation de logiques institutionnelles et dynamique des routines organisationnelles]

Author

Listed:
  • Florence Charue-Duboc

    (PREG-CRG - Pole de recherche en économie et gestion - X - École polytechnique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nathalie Raulet-Croset

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School, PREG-CRG - Pole de recherche en économie et gestion - X - École polytechnique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the evolution of organizational routines which occur when organizations are confronted to the coexistence of institutional logics. The empirical case concern organizations providing telecare services for elderly frail persons in France and which face a medical and a social care logic in their activity. The routine dynamic develops when the logics' coexistence create tensions in the activity, because of ambiguous and uncertain situations. We show that new routines hybridizing the two logics appear, and that routines appear linked to the social care logic, which is less specific.

Suggested Citation

  • Florence Charue-Duboc & Nathalie Raulet-Croset, 2014. "Competing institutional logics and the evolution of organizational routines [Confrontation de logiques institutionnelles et dynamique des routines organisationnelles]," Post-Print hal-01889483, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01889483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01889483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.