IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01794358.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Doxai, Principles and Norms: a proposal for a methodological tool to improve evaluation methods
[Doxai, Principes et Normes : une proposition d’outil méthodologique pour améliorer les méthodes d’évaluation]

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Colletis

    (LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville)

  • Maryse Salles

    (IRIT-SIG - Systèmes d’Informations Généralisées - IRIT - Institut de recherche en informatique de Toulouse - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - TMBI - Toulouse Mind & Brain Institut - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse, UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

Abstract

The paper proposes a methodological tool to improve the methods of policy evaluation. The research work underlying this article has been conducted in a two-disciplinary approach, combining the field of economics with that of information systems. The first part of the paper is devoted to a review of the literature in the field of public policy evaluation aimed at identifying the difficulties of evaluation. In a second stage, the problem of labor is explained. Then the DPN tool (doxai-principles-standards) is presented. Its aim is to help reveal the chains that link the visions of the world (paradigms, values) with the indicators of evaluation, by way of the structuring level of the principles. The tool is compared with the evaluation difficulties identified in the literature. An application of the tool is the third stage of the article, leading to proposals for indicators for the evaluation of territorial economic development policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Colletis & Maryse Salles, 2018. "Doxai, Principles and Norms: a proposal for a methodological tool to improve evaluation methods [Doxai, Principes et Normes : une proposition d’outil méthodologique pour améliorer les méthodes d’év," Post-Print hal-01794358, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01794358
    DOI: 10.3917/reru.182.0463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01794358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.