Author
Listed:
- Jens Bennedsen
(Aarhus School of Engineering - Aarhus University [Aarhus])
- Siegfried Rouvrais
(PASS - Process for Adaptative Software Systems - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IRISA-D4 - LANGAGE ET GÉNIE LOGICIEL - IRISA - Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires - UR - Université de Rennes - INSA Rennes - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - ENS Rennes - École normale supérieure - Rennes - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - CentraleSupélec - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT Atlantique - INFO - Département Informatique - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
- Janne Röslof
(University of Turku)
- Juha Kontio
(University of Turku)
- Fredrik Georgsson
(Umeå University = Umeå Universitet)
- Charly Mccartan
(QUB - Queen's University [Belfast])
Abstract
This article discusses the tension between quality assurance and quality enhancement in engineering education at a programme level. It acknowledges that accreditation has evolved for many years, but does not agilely support innovation or implement changes in educational programmes. Existing quality assurance systems, institutional collaboration networks, as well as new innovative quality enhancement models and processes are described, contrasted and synthesised. Quality enhancement is analysed based on its function as a source of inspiration and dissemination of good practice. The article reflects on a novel and more collaborative approach to quality enhancement, built on the foundations of specific pedagogical standards and rubrics (e.g. CDIO). One solution leading to real continuous quality enhancement could be flexible and agile evaluation processes. These are founded on measurement and rating frameworks and complemented with quality assurance for engineering education. Incremental enhancement is based on relevant needs identified collaboratively between programmes.
Suggested Citation
Jens Bennedsen & Siegfried Rouvrais & Janne Röslof & Juha Kontio & Fredrik Georgsson & Charly Mccartan, 2018.
"Collaborative quality enhancement in engineering education: an overview of operational models at a programme level,"
Post-Print
hal-01759082, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01759082
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1443058
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01759082v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01759082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.