IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01682988.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Bujold
  • Pierre Pluye
  • France Legare

    (Centre de Recherche - CHUQ - HSFA - Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise [CHU Québec] - CHU de Québec–Université Laval - ULaval - Université Laval [Québec])

  • Jeannie Haggerty
  • Genevieve C Gore
  • Reem El Sherif
  • Marie-Eve Poitras
  • Marie-Claude Beaulieu
  • Marie-Dominique Beaulieu
  • Paula L. Bush
  • Yves Couturier

    (Research Centre on Aging, Centre integré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie (CIUSSS de l'Estrie - CHUS) - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke)

  • Beatrice Débarges
  • Justin Gagnon
  • Anik Giguère
  • Roland Grad
  • Vera Granikov
  • Serge Goulet
  • Catherine Hudon
  • Bernardo Kremer
  • Edeltraut Kröger
  • Irina Kudrina
  • Bertrand Lebouché

    (Montreal Chest Institute - MUHC - McGill University Health Center [Montreal])

  • Christine Loignon
  • Marie-Therese Lussier
  • Cristiano Martello
  • Quynh Nguyen
  • Rebekah Pratt
  • Benoit Rihoux
  • Ellen Rosenberg
  • Isabelle Samson
  • Nicolas Senn
  • David Li Tang
  • Masashi Tsujimoto
  • Isabelle Vedel
  • Bruno Ventelou

    (GREQAM - Groupement de Recherche en Économie Quantitative d'Aix-Marseille - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Michel Wensing

Abstract

Introduction Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and unmet decisional needs regarding possible options in a cascade of interrelated decisions involving different stakeholders (themselves, their families, their caregivers, their healthcare practitioners). Gaps in knowledge, values clarification and social support in situations where options need to be deliberated hamper effective decision support interventions. This review aims to (1) assess decisional needs of PCCNs from the perspective of stakeholders, (2) build a taxonomy of these decisional needs and (3) prioritise decisional needs with knowledge users (clinicians, patients and managers). Methods and analysis This review will be based on the interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) model and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Applying a participatory research approach, we will identify potentially relevant studies through a comprehensive literature search; select relevant ones using eligibility criteria inspired from our previous scoping review on PCCNs; appraise quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; conduct a three-step synthesis (sequential exploratory mixed methods design) to build taxonomy of key decisional needs; and integrate these results with those of a parallel PCCNs' qualitative decisional need assessment (semistructured interviews and focus group with stakeholders). Ethics and dissemination This systematic review, together with the qualitative study (approved by the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Service Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean ethical committee), will produce a working taxonomy of key decisional needs (ontological contribution), to inform the subsequent user-centred design of a support tool for addressing PCCNs' decisional needs (practical contribution). We will adapt the IP-SDM model, normally dealing with a single decision, for PCCNs who experience cascade of decisions involving different stakeholders (theoretical contribution). Knowledge users will facilitate dissemination of the results in the Canadian primary care network. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015020558.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Bujold & Pierre Pluye & France Legare & Jeannie Haggerty & Genevieve C Gore & Reem El Sherif & Marie-Eve Poitras & Marie-Claude Beaulieu & Marie-Dominique Beaulieu & Paula L. Bush & Yves Coutu, 2017. "Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol," Post-Print hal-01682988, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01682988
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shauni Van Doren & David De Coninck & Kirsten Hermans & Anja Declercq, 2021. "Examining Care Assessment Scores of Community-Dwelling Adults in Flanders, Belgium: The Role of Socio-Psychological and Assessor-Related Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01682988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.