IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01651595.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La formation et la violation du contrat psychologique : quels processus cognitifs ?

Author

Listed:
  • Jérôme Gardody

    (CEMOI - Centre d'Économie et de Management de l'Océan Indien - UR - Université de La Réunion)

Abstract

This study aims at extending previous literature on psychological contracts by examining the cognitive process underlying the formation and violation of reciprocal obligations. Based on 42 semi-directive interviews, this qualitative semi-grounded theory approach provides three major contributions. First, our results show that the socio-cognitive process underlying the formation of the psychological contract by the employee (Rousseau, 1995) can take different forms depending on the nature of perceived organizational commitments. We refer to the adaptation process driven (1) by organizational communications (2) by preexisting beliefs or (3) by a combination of both. Second, our data allows us to identify different types of emotion associated to violation, along with the forms of evaluations associated with the process of formation. Finally, our model accounts for the different steps through which different emotions lead to distinct attitudinal and behavioral reactions. This contingent and idiosyncratic process draws on two factors : a tendency to action and a post-tendency evaluation. Based on this knowledge, we provide managers with a series of tools allowing them to proactively manage the violation state experienced by their subordinates. We recommend giving more attention to the process of formation of the psychological contract and to the dimensions involved in the post-breech evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérôme Gardody, 2016. "La formation et la violation du contrat psychologique : quels processus cognitifs ?," Post-Print hal-01651595, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01651595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01651595. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.