IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01519874.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diffusion of a collaborative care model in primary care: a longitudinal qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Vedel

    (Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research [Montréal] - McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada] - Jewish General Hospital)

  • Veronique Ghadi

    (UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Matthieu de Stampa

    (UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Christelle Routelous

    (EA MOS - EA Management des Organisations de Santé - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP] - PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP], IDM - Institut du Management - EHESP - École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique [EHESP])

  • Howard Bergman
  • Joel Ankri

    (VIMA - Vieillissement et Maladies chroniques : approches épidémiologique et de santé publique - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale)

  • Liette Lapointe

    (Instituto de Matemática y Física - Universidad de Talca - Universidad de Talca)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although collaborative team models (CTM) improve care processes and health outcomes, their diffusion poses challenges related to difficulties in securing their adoption by primary care clinicians (PCPs). The objectives of this study are to understand: (1) how the perceived characteristics of a CTM influenced clinicians' decision to adopt -or not- the model; and (2) the model's diffusion process. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal case study based on the Diffusion of Innovations Theory. First, diffusion curves were developed for all 175 PCPs and 59 nurses practicing in one borough of Paris. Second, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a representative sample of 40 PCPs and 15 nurses to better understand the implementation dynamics. RESULTS: Diffusion curves showed that 3.5 years after the start of the implementation, 100% of nurses and over 80% of PCPs had adopted the CTM. The dynamics of the CTM's diffusion were different between the PCPs and the nurses. The slopes of the two curves are also distinctly different. Among the nurses, the critical mass of adopters was attained faster, since they adopted the CTM earlier and more quickly than the PCPs. Results of the semi-structured interviews showed that these differences in diffusion dynamics were mostly founded in differences between the PCPs' and the nurses' perceptions of the CTM's compatibility with norms, values and practices and its relative advantage (impact on patient management and work practices). Opinion leaders played a key role in the diffusion of the CTM among PCPs. CONCLUSION: CTM diffusion is a social phenomenon that requires a major commitment by clinicians and a willingness to take risks; the role of opinion leaders is key. Paying attention to the notion of a critical mass of adopters is essential to developing implementation strategies that will accelerate the adoption process by clinicians.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Vedel & Veronique Ghadi & Matthieu de Stampa & Christelle Routelous & Howard Bergman & Joel Ankri & Liette Lapointe, 2013. "Diffusion of a collaborative care model in primary care: a longitudinal qualitative study," Post-Print hal-01519874, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01519874
    DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-3
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01519874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01519874/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/1471-2296-14-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01519874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.