IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482647.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Therapeutic failure in scabies : An observational study

Author

Listed:
  • B. de Sainte Marie
  • S. Mallet

    (LARGEPA - Laboratoire de recherche en sciences de gestion Panthéon-Assas - UP2 - Université Panthéon-Assas)

  • C. Gaudy-Marqueste
  • K. Baumstarck

    (SPMC - Santé Publique et maladies Chroniques : Qualité de vie Concepts, Usages et Limites, Déterminants - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille)

  • N. Bentaleb
  • A. Loundou

    (SPMC - Santé Publique et maladies Chroniques : Qualité de vie Concepts, Usages et Limites, Déterminants - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille)

  • S. Hesse
  • S. Monestier
  • J. -J. Grob
  • M. -A. Richard

Abstract

Background. - Several sources suggest an escalation of scabies in ă France. ă Aim. - To describe a population of patients continuing to present with ă scabies despite multiple treatments in order to identify factors ă associated with persistence of infection. ă Patients and methods. A descriptive cross-sectional study in adults and ă children consulting for persistent scabies despite at least one previous ă treatment. A standardized questionnaire explored potential sources of ă treatment failure. ă Results. - Thirty-one patients were analyzed. Initial symptoms were ă noted to have started between two and 52 weeks earlier (mean: 19 weeks). ă The mean number of prior consultations with a general practitioner was ă 3.1 (0-10) and 1.7 with a dermatologist (0-7). The mean number of ă patients per household was 3.5 (1-9). At least one dose of oral ă ivermectin (maximum of 6 doses per household) was prescribed for 84% of ă patients (29% of whom were not fasted at the time). Further, 74 % of ă patients received at least one local application of esdepallethrin and ă piperonyl butoxide (maximum: 5 courses), four received benzyl benzoate ă and two received permethrin; however, 58 % did not reapply the ă substance after hand washing. All households bought the prescribed ă treatments despite the costs. Close contacts of patients were treated in ă 58% of households. Decontamination of bedding and clothing was carried ă out properly in 90% of households. ă Discussion. - Persistence of infection appears to be linked to: (1) ă insufficient treatment of close contacts; (2) absence of a second ă treatment between days 7 and 14; (3) insufficient efficacy of the ă available treatments, doubtless due to multiple factors (intrinsic ă resistance of Sarcoptes, failure to repeat treatment, poor explanation ă of methods for dosing and application, and oral intake of treatments). ă Access to non-reimbursed treatments was not identified as a problem and ă decontamination of bedding and clothing was correctly performed in most ă cases. ă Conclusion. Though certain fundamental aspects of scabies treatment must ă be better known, longer consultations and provision of efficacious ă treatments are also a priority. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights ă reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • B. de Sainte Marie & S. Mallet & C. Gaudy-Marqueste & K. Baumstarck & N. Bentaleb & A. Loundou & S. Hesse & S. Monestier & J. -J. Grob & M. -A. Richard, 2016. "Therapeutic failure in scabies : An observational study," Post-Print hal-01482647, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482647
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2015.10.588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality of Life;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.