IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482532.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion ă between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Ohannessian
  • Karine Baumstarck

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Julia Maruani
  • Emmanuelle Cohen-Solal
  • Pascal Auquier

    (SPMC - Santé Publique et maladies Chroniques : Qualité de vie Concepts, Usages et Limites, Déterminants - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille)

  • Aubert Agostini

Abstract

Objective: Misoprostol and mifepristone are the two substances ă recommended for cervical preparation during first -trimester surgical ă abortions to decrease intraoperative bleeding and complications. The ă objective of the study was to evaluate whether the combination of ă mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical preparation in an elective ă surgical abortion between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation can reduce blood ă loss in comparison to misoprostol or mifepristone alone. ă Study design: A randomized controlled trial was performed in Marseille, ă France between May 2013 and May 2014. Women requesting a surgical ă abortion under general anesthesia between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation ă were 198, randomized into three groups: one received 400 mu g oral ă misoprostol 3 h before surgery, one 200 mg oral mifepristone 36 h before ă surgery, and the other, both treatments. The main outcome was the ă quantity of intraoperative bleeding. The secondary outcomes were ă duration of intervention, ease of dilatation, and complications. ă Results: The quantity of intraoperative bleeding differed significantly ă between the groups (p = 0.001): 222 +/- 64 mL in the combination group, ă 329 +/- 129 mL in the misoprostol group, and 276 +/- 119 mL in the ă mifepristone group. The combination was associated with a shorter ă operative duration (p = 0.001): 5 +/- 2 min in the combination group, 7 ă +/- 5 min in the misoprostol group, and 7 +/- 3 min in the mifepristone ă group. A hemorrhage was observed for 5 of 55 women (9%) in the ă combination group, 13 of 51(25%) in the misoprostol group, and 9 of 56 ă (16%) in the mifepristone group (p = 0.08). No cervical laceration or ă uterine perforation was reported. ă Conclusions: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol in cervical ă preparation for elective surgical abortions between 12 and 14 weeks of ă gestation significantly reduced blood loss in comparison to misoprostol ă or mifepristone alone. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights ă reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Ohannessian & Karine Baumstarck & Julia Maruani & Emmanuelle Cohen-Solal & Pascal Auquier & Aubert Agostini, 2016. "Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion ă between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial," Post-Print hal-01482532, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482532
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.