IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482530.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prospective comparison of Ga-68-DOTATATE and F-18-FDOPA PET/CT in patients with various pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas with emphasis on sporadic cases

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelien Archier
  • Arthur Varoquaux

    (CRMBM - Centre de résonance magnétique biologique et médicale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Philippe Garrigue

    (VRCM - Vascular research center of Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CERIMED - Centre Européen de Recherche en Imagerie médicale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - IPC - Institut Paoli-Calmettes - Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Radiopharmacie [Hôpital de la Timone- Hôpital Nord - APHM] - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] - Hôpital Nord [CHU - APHM])

  • Marion Montava

    (Service d'ORL, CHU Nord - LBA UMR T24 - Laboratoire de Biomécanique Appliquée - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - Université Gustave Eiffel)

  • Carole Guérin

    (CHU Conception - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Conception)

  • Sophie Gabriel

    (IFA - Institute für arbeitsschutz deutschen gesetzlichen unfallversicherung)

  • Eva Beschmout
  • Isabelle Morange

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Nicolas Fakhry
  • Frederic Castinetti

    (CRN2M - Centre de recherche en neurobiologie - neurophysiologie de Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Frédéric Sebag

    (Service de chirurgie générale et endocrinienne - TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM])

  • Anne A. Barlier

    (CRN2M - Centre de recherche en neurobiologie - neurophysiologie de Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Anderson Loundou

    (Unité d'Aide Méthodologique - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - CHU Marseille)

  • Benjamin Guillet

    (VRCM - Vascular research center of Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, CERIMED - Centre Européen de Recherche en Imagerie médicale - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - ECM - École Centrale de Marseille - IPC - Institut Paoli-Calmettes - Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Radiopharmacie [Hôpital de la Timone- Hôpital Nord - APHM] - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - TIMONE - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] - Hôpital Nord [CHU - APHM])

  • Karel Pacak
  • David Taieh

Abstract

Purpose Pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PHEOs/PGLs) overexpress ă somatostatin receptors and recent studies have already shown excellent ă results in the localization of these tumors using Ga-68-labeled ă somatostatin analogs (Ga-68-DOTA-SSA), especially in patients with ă germline succinate dehydrogenase subunit B gene (SDHB) mutations and ă head and neck PGLs (HNPGLs). The value of Ga-68-DOTA-SSA has to be ă established in sporadic cases, including PHEOs. Thus, the aim of this ă study was to compare Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT, F-18-FDOPA PET/CT, and ă conventional imaging in patients with various PHEOs/PGLs with a special ă emphasis on sporadic cases, including those located in the adrenal ă gland. ă Design Ga-68-DOTATATE, F-18-FDOPA PET/CT, and conventional imaging ă (contrast-enhanced CT and MRI with MR angiography sequences) were ă prospectively performed in 30 patients (8 with SDHD mutations, 1 with a ă MAX mutation and 21 sporadic cases) with PHEO/PGL at initial diagnosis ă or relapse. ă Results The patient-based sensitivities were 93 % (28/30), 97 % ă (29/30), and 93 % (28/30) for Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT, F-18-FDOPA PET/CT, ă and conventional imaging, respectively. The lesion-based sensitivities ă were 93 % (43/46), 89 % (41/46), and 76 % (35/46) for Ga-68-DOTATATE ă PET/CT, F-18-FDOPA PET/CT, and conventional imaging respectively (p = ă 0.042). Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT detected a higher number of HNPGLs (30/30) ă than F-18-FDOPA PET/CT (26/30; p = 0.112) and conventional imaging ă (24/30; p = 0.024). Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT missed two PHEOs of a few ă millimeters in size and a large recurrent PHEO. One lesion was ă considered false-positive on Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT and corresponded to a ă typical focal lesion of fibrous dysplasia on MRI. Among the 11 lesions ă missed by conventional imaging, 7 were detected by conventional imaging ă with knowledge of the PET results (4 HNPGLs, 2 LNs, and 1 recurrent ă PHEO). ă Conclusion Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT is the most sensitive tool in the ă detection of HNPGLs, especially SDHD-related tumors, which may be very ă small and fail to concentrate sufficient F-18-FDOPA. The present study ă further expands the use of Ga-68-DOTATATE for all patients with HNPGLs, ă regardless of their genotype. Ga-68-DOTATATE PET/CT may be inferior to ă F-18-FDOPA PET/CT in the detection PHEOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelien Archier & Arthur Varoquaux & Philippe Garrigue & Marion Montava & Carole Guérin & Sophie Gabriel & Eva Beschmout & Isabelle Morange & Nicolas Fakhry & Frederic Castinetti & Frédéric Sebag & A, 2016. "Prospective comparison of Ga-68-DOTATATE and F-18-FDOPA PET/CT in patients with various pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas with emphasis on sporadic cases," Post-Print hal-01482530, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482530
    DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3268-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.