IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482525.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Validation of the American version of the CareGiver Oncology Quality of ă Life (CarGOQoL) questionnaire

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah C. Kaveney
  • Karine Baumstarck

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Patricia Minaya-Flores
  • Tarrah Shannon
  • Philip Symes
  • Anderson Loundou

    (Unité d'Aide Méthodologique - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - CHU Marseille)

  • Pascal Auquier

    (SPMC - Santé Publique et maladies Chroniques : Qualité de vie Concepts, Usages et Limites, Déterminants - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille)

Abstract

Background: The CareGiver Oncology Quality of Life (CarGOQoL) ă questionnaire, a 29-item, multidimensional, self-administered ă questionnaire, was validated using a large French sample. We reported ă the linguistic validation process and the metric validity of the English ă version of CarGOQoL in the United-States. ă Methods: The translation process consisted of 3 consecutive steps: ă forward-backward translation, acceptability testing, and cognitive ă interviews. The psychometric testing was applied to caregivers of ă consecutive patients with representative cancers who were recruited from ă the Regional Cancer Center in northwestern Pennsylvania. All individuals ă completed the CarGOQoL at baseline, day-30, and day-90. Internal ă consistency, reliability, external validity, reproducibility, and ă sensitivity to change were tested. ă Results: The translated version was validated on a total of 87 American ă cancer caregivers. The dimensions of the CarGOQoL generally demonstrated ă a high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70 for all but four ă domain scores). External validity testing revealed that the CarGOQoL ă index score correlated significantly with all SF-36 dimension scores ă except the physical composite score (Pearson's correlation: 0.28-0.70). ă Reproducibility was satisfactory at day-30 (intraclass correlation ă coefficient: 0.46-0.94) and day-90 (0.43-0.92). Four specific dimensions ă of CarGOQoL showed responsiveness: the Psychological well-being, the ă Relationships with health care system, the Social support and the ă Finances. ă Conclusions: The American version of the CarGOQoL constitutes a useful ă instrument to measure QoL in caregivers of cancer patients in the ă United-States.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah C. Kaveney & Karine Baumstarck & Patricia Minaya-Flores & Tarrah Shannon & Philip Symes & Anderson Loundou & Pascal Auquier, 2016. "Validation of the American version of the CareGiver Oncology Quality of ă Life (CarGOQoL) questionnaire," Post-Print hal-01482525, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482525
    DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0487-6
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01482525
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01482525/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s12955-016-0487-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.