IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482512.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could ă general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study

Author

Listed:
  • Maeva Jego
  • Dominique Grassineau
  • Hubert Balique
  • Anderson Loundou

    (Unité d'Aide Méthodologique - APHM - Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille - CHU Marseille)

  • Roland Sambuc

    (AMU MED - Aix-Marseille Université - Faculté de médecine - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Alexandre Daguzan
  • Gaetan Gentile
  • Stéphanie Gentile

    (ASL Salerno)

Abstract

Objectives: To analyse the views of general practitioners (GPs) about ă how they can provide care to homeless people (HP) and to explore which ă measures could influence their views. ă Design: Mixed-methods design (qualitative -> quantitative ă (cross-sectional observational) -> qualitative). Qualitative data were ă collected through semistructured interviews and through questionnaires ă with closed questions. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive ă statistical analyses on SPPS; a content analysis was applied on ă qualitative data. ă Setting: Primary care; views of urban GPs working in a deprived area in ă Marseille were explored by questionnaires and/or semistructured ă interview. ă Participants: 19 GPs involved in HP's healthcare were recruited for ă phase 1 (qualitative); for phase 2 (quantitative), 150 GPs who provide ă routine healthcare ('standard' GPs) were randomised, 144 met the ă inclusion criteria and 105 responded to the questionnaire; for phase 3 ă (qualitative), data were explored on 14 `standard' GPs. ă Results: In the quantitative phase, 79% of the 105 GPs already treated ă HP. Most of the difficulties they encountered while treating HP ă concerned social matters (mean level of perceived difficulties=3.95/5, ă IC 95 (3.74 to 4.17)), lack of medical information (mn=3.78/5, IC 95 ă (3.55 to 4.01)) patient's compliance (mn=3.67/5, IC 95 (3.45 to 3.89)), ă loneliness in practice (mn=3.45/5, IC 95 (3.18 to 3.72)) and time ă required for the doctor (mn=3.25, IC 95 (3 to 3.5)). From qualitative ă analysis we understood that maintaining a stable follow-up was a major ă condition for GPs to contribute effectively to the care of HP. Acting on ă health system organisation, developing a medical and psychosocial ă approach with closer relation with social workers and enhancing the ă collaboration between tailored and non-tailored programmes were also ă other key answers. ă Conclusions: If we adapt the conditions of GPs practice, they could ă contribute to the improvement of HP's health. These results will enable ă the construction of a new model of primary care organisation aiming to ă improve access to healthcare for HP.

Suggested Citation

  • Maeva Jego & Dominique Grassineau & Hubert Balique & Anderson Loundou & Roland Sambuc & Alexandre Daguzan & Gaetan Gentile & Stéphanie Gentile, 2016. "Improving access and continuity of care for homeless people: how could ă general practitioners effectively contribute? Results from a mixed study," Post-Print hal-01482512, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482512
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013610
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01482512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01482512/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.