IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01482381.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Postoperative analgesia after caesarean section with transversus ă abdominis plane block or continuous infiltration wound catheter: A ă randomized clinical trial. TAP vs. infiltration after caesarean section

Author

Listed:
  • Fanny Klasen
  • Aurelie Bourgoin
  • Francois Antonini
  • Emma Dazeas
  • Florence Bretelle

    (URMITE - Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - IFR48 - INSB-CNRS - Institut des sciences biologiques - CNRS Biologie - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gynépole - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - Hôpital Nord [CHU - APHM])

  • Karine Baumstarck

    (AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Marc Leone

    (URMITE - Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - INSERM - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - IFR48 - INSB-CNRS - Institut des sciences biologiques - CNRS Biologie - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Claude Martin

Abstract

Objective: Single shot transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and ă continuous local anesthetic infiltration wound catheter (CLAIWC) ă decreased the morphine consumption after caesarean section. The aim of ă this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of CLAIWC and ă ultrasound-guided TAP block. ă Method: Sixty patients undergoing caesarean section were prospectively ă randomized. After the caesarean section, the postoperative analgesia was ă randomized to either a CLAIWC localized below the fascia with an ă elastomeric pump for 48 hours or a bilateral ultrasound-guided TAP block ă with injection of ropivacaine. Every patient had a morphine pump ă patient-controlled analgesia. The primary outcome was the morphine ă consumption during the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes were pain ă score levels, adverse effects of opioids, and patient satisfaction. ă Variables were collected during 48 hours after the caesarean section. ă Results: Median cumulative 48-hour morphine consumption was 17 [8-51] ă mg in the TAP group versus 21 [7-34] mg in the CLAIWC group (P = 0.3). ă We did not find a difference between the groups regarding pain, side ă effects and satisfaction scores. ă Conclusion: As part of a multimodal analgesic regimen, there is no ă significant difference between the TAP block and CLAIWC for ă postoperative analgesia after a caesarean section. (C) 2016 Societe ă francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier ă Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Fanny Klasen & Aurelie Bourgoin & Francois Antonini & Emma Dazeas & Florence Bretelle & Karine Baumstarck & Marc Leone & Claude Martin, 2016. "Postoperative analgesia after caesarean section with transversus ă abdominis plane block or continuous infiltration wound catheter: A ă randomized clinical trial. TAP vs. infiltration after caesarean ," Post-Print hal-01482381, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482381
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.02.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quality;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01482381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.