IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01411468.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of perceived justice's dimensions on satisfaction within the management of claims on Twitter : integration of the social dimension of intimacy in the interactional justice scale
[Impact des dimensions de la justice perçue sur la satisfaction dans le cadre de la gestion des réclamations sur Twitter : intégration de la dimension d'intimité sociale dans l'échelle de mesure de la justice interactionnelle]

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Baudier

    (PULV - Pôle Universitaire Léonard de Vinci)

  • Chantal Ammi

    (IMT-BS - MMS - Département Management, Marketing et Stratégie - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management)

Abstract

Companies are questioning the relevance of using Twitter to manage complaints and its impact on satisfaction. In order to measure the return to satisfaction we mobilized the perceived justice theory. The analysis of a convenience sample of 221 Sosh customers confirms the importance of creating an intimate relationship. We have compared our results to previous studies using others means of claim and integrated to the measurement scale of justice interactional a dimension of social intimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Baudier & Chantal Ammi, 2016. "Impact of perceived justice's dimensions on satisfaction within the management of claims on Twitter : integration of the social dimension of intimacy in the interactional justice scale [Impact des ," Post-Print hal-01411468, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01411468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01411468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.