IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01374704.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Testing the waters of coastal urbanization: Contested projects on Corsica's protected lands

Author

Listed:
  • Romain Melot

    (SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AgroParisTech)

  • Jean Christophe Paoli

    (LRDE - Laboratoire de Recherches sur le Développement de l'Elevage - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

Abstract

In the wake of the decentralisation reforms implemented in France in the early 1980's, the Coast Protection Act ("loi littoral") was enacted in 1986 to counter-balance the significant regulatory powers devolved through those reforms to local municipalities in matters of urban planning. The Act's purpose was to contain urban sprawl, especially in heretofore undeveloped and protected areas like those found on the Corsican coastline. Many local officials protested that the act would freeze any development on vast tracts of land and become a hindrance to carrying out potentially lucrative tourism projects on the most attractive coastal frontage parcels. The inquiry draws on a statistical sample of 252 legal arguments put forward in 180 claims, which were filed in the Corsican Administrative Court during the 2004-2011 period. From a sociological perspective, we examine in this article the strategies behind litigation and the use of the administrative courts as a means to resolve conflicts that have arisen over the attempted development of protected coastal areas. Special attention is paid to disputes over proposed development projects against which claims have been filed by local inhabitants and state administrators with the intention of containing urban sprawl.

Suggested Citation

  • Romain Melot & Jean Christophe Paoli, 2016. "Testing the waters of coastal urbanization: Contested projects on Corsica's protected lands," Post-Print hal-01374704, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01374704
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1219698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01374704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.