IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01361117.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to understand the Commons: Elinor Ostrom, Ownership and the New Institutional Economics
[Comment comprendre les « communs » : Elinor Ostrom, la propriété et la nouvelle économie institutionnelle]

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Weinstein

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the institutional theory of Elinor Ostrom, in its relations to the "new institutional economics", and more particularly the analyzes which, following the Coase paper on social costs, gives a special place to the question of ownership. This will allow us to highlight key aspects of the theorization of Elinor Ostrom, and the issues they raise. We proceed in three steps. We first evoke the main theoretical references that are the basis of her analysis of Common Pool Resources, and mark some of her theoretical orientations. We then goes on to explore the key features of Elinor Ostrom's institutionalism, confronted with the new institutionalism. To do this, we first consider her original and important analysis of rules and norms, and its conception of economic behavior, then we explore her theory of property rights and of the conditions of selection of forms of property and institutions, with the prospect of a confrontation with the idea of a "generalized Coase theorem". This leads us, finally, to questioning Elinor Ostrom's views on institutions and the commons, and possible ways to go beyond these conceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Weinstein, 2013. "How to understand the Commons: Elinor Ostrom, Ownership and the New Institutional Economics [Comment comprendre les « communs » : Elinor Ostrom, la propriété et la nouvelle économie institutionnell," Post-Print hal-01361117, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01361117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prévost, Benoît & Rivaud, Audrey, 2018. "The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of New Institutional Economics on legal issues," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 370-380.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01361117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.