It has often been claimed over the last decade that there has been a transformation of neoclassical economics and that as a consequence orthodox economics is now pluralistic, while heterodox economics needed to recognize this evolution and also needed to change in order to become more acceptable to the mainstream. Both editors always felt uncomfortable with this assessment and the preface recalls how the editors felt compelled to respond to it and to gather a series of responses from colleagues.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||2013|
|Publication status:||Published in In Defense of Post-Keynesian Economics and Heterodox Economics: Response to their Critics, Routledge, pp. xiii-xv, 2013|
|Note:||View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal-univ-paris13.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01343663|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01343663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.