IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01298405.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Case Study 4: Critical Organisations - Multi-national corporations

Author

Listed:
  • Allison Marie Loconto

    (LISIS - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations, Sociétés - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - ESIEE Paris - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In this chapter, I focus on how MNCs are justifying the responsibility of their vision and technologies for the sustainability of agri-food systems. I pay close attention to how responsibility is distributed between actors in the institutional arrangements and which instruments are used to govern the responsibility of actors. This case is of interest to RES-AGorA because it explores how large, multi-national, private businesses are addressing issues of responsible research and innovation. These characteristics strategically position MNCs as critical organisations within the existing rri landscape as they are both highly invested in conducting research and innovation in the agricultural sector and are also carrying this research through an innovation process to introduce new products and technologies to markets from within a single organisational environment. We explore three different MNCs – two of the leading food manufacturers (Nestlé and Unilever) and one of the leading agricultural input manufacturers (Syngenta). These three organisations are among the leaders in their sectors and have each made ‘responsibility' a fundamental aspect of their innovation agenda. Due to time and access constraints, this case study does not go into detail of each individual case. Rather, it focuses on a cross-comparison that identifies common governance instruments across the three companies. These instruments are currently serving as de facto rri governance mechanisms within private-sector research on agri-food systems. This comparative approach helps us to better understand the conditions under which ‘shared understandings of responsibilities' are developed within and between organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Allison Marie Loconto, 2016. "Case Study 4: Critical Organisations - Multi-national corporations," Post-Print hal-01298405, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01298405
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01298405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01298405/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01298405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.