IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01294816.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A bibliometric analysis of Research on 4PL

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence Saglietto

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Cécile Cézanne

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Purpose: Since the mid-1990s, logistics auditing and consulting are central tasks outsourced by firms to fourth-party logistics (4PL) providers. But, little attention has been paid on the precise role and the official economic status of these key industrial actors. The aim of the paper is to provide a systematic assessment of the body of extant publications on 4PL, propose and discuss the structuration of this topic area and suggest how it might advance. Design/methodology/approach: This paper adopts a bibliometric viewpoint to analyse the academic literature and the business press that has addressed the study of 4PL. It has examined the Business Source Complete and Science Direct databases since 1996 to 2015. Main findings: 72 academic and magazine articles and have finally been studied to portray 4PL based on three main themes (1) justifications of outsourcing logistics activities to 4PL; (2) 4PL’s operations and roles in the supply chain, and (3) optimisation of 4PL’s activities. We synthetize and discuss these distinctive features and advance a proposal of portraying 4PL as i) human capital-intensive firms, ii) experts in complex tasks solving, iii) key partners with economic power which need to be regulated in the global supply chain. Originality/value: This paper fulfils an identified need to survey a fragmented theoretical field of analysis. It provides an assessment of the concept of 4PL and suggests avenues for future research.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence Saglietto & Cécile Cézanne, 2015. "A bibliometric analysis of Research on 4PL," Post-Print hal-01294816, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01294816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hans-Joachim Schramm & Carolin Nicole Czaja & Michael Dittrich & Matthias Mentschel, 2019. "Current Advancements of and Future Developments for Fourth Party Logistics in a Digital Future," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    4PL; Bibliometry;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01294816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.