IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01273484.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Research and conceptual development related to well-being at work: between evaluation and intervention
[Recherche et développement conceptuels autour du bien-être au travail : entre mesure et action]

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Grosjean

    (HT - Département Homme au Travail - INRS ( Vandoeuvre lès Nancy) - Institut national de recherche et de sécurité (Vandoeuvre lès Nancy))

  • Nadja Formet

    (HT - Département Homme au Travail - INRS ( Vandoeuvre lès Nancy) - Institut national de recherche et de sécurité (Vandoeuvre lès Nancy))

  • Virginie Althaus

    (PSY-NCA - Psychologie et Neurosciences de la Cognition et de l'affectivité - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

  • Jean-Luc Kop

    (INTERPSY - Laboratoire de psychologie de l'interaction et des relations intersubjectives - UL - Université de Lorraine)

  • Eric Brangier

    (PErSEUs - Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience utilisateurs - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

INRS initiated in 2003 a research theme around well-being at work. This axis of research was coherent with the work of the European institution on health and safety. The term "well-being" is also a possible strategy for enterprises to develop their performance with a paradigm shift from stress and fear management. It is more inclusive for elderly workers, people suffering of a disability, etc. The work carried out in INRS has been built under a common conceptual umbrella. A new paradigm has emerged which seems in phase with emerging risk and corporate governance evolutions. We can notice these common characteristics of well-being approaches: -less emphasis on risk objectivation, as far as psychosocial phenomenon are concerned with the subjective relation to work; -the reducton of bundaries between risk management and other corporate questions such as ages management, motivation, competencies; -the necessity of early action and the relative lose of weight of diagnosis; -the central role of workers in the identification of their difficulties and as actors of change. Two main tools have been developed in INRS : The first one called "Satin" has been built around a health questionnaire developed in partnership with the University of Lorraine, France. It is adapted to the medium or large companies, where it addresses the level of teams. The second approach is based on the systemic paradigm and is more suitable for SMEs-SMIs. It has also beneficied of a partnership with the University of Lorraine.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Grosjean & Nadja Formet & Virginie Althaus & Jean-Luc Kop & Eric Brangier, 2014. "Research and conceptual development related to well-being at work: between evaluation and intervention [Recherche et développement conceptuels autour du bien-être au travail : entre mesure et actio," Post-Print hal-01273484, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01273484
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01273484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01273484/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Burn out; Souffrance au travail; Satisfaction au travail; Methodologie; RPS; Bien-être au travail;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01273484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.