IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01134087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How do different dimensions of distance affect market entry mode choice ? An application of the CAGE-distance framework

Author

Listed:
  • Emna Moalla

    (ESCEM Tours Poitiers - ESCEM School of Business and Management - Groupe école supérieure de commerce et de management Tours-Poitiers)

  • Ulrike Mayrhofer

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to assess the impact of national distance on market entry mode choice. Using the CAGE framework proposed by Ghemawat (2001), the authors measure the effect of four different dimensions of distance on the choice between cooperation and merger-acquisition. The hypotheses are tested on a sample of 203 interfirm linkages formed by French companies with partners across the world. The results indicate that administrative and economic distance has a significant influence on market entry mode choice, whereas the impact of cultural and geographic distance is not significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Emna Moalla & Ulrike Mayrhofer, 2014. "How do different dimensions of distance affect market entry mode choice ? An application of the CAGE-distance framework," Post-Print hal-01134087, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01134087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01134087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.