IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01132439.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health it policy in the UK: the case of electronic health records

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Currie

    (Audencia Recherche - Audencia Business School)

Abstract

The challenge to provide a nation-wide integrated health service is part of a UK government policy to transform healthcare using information and communications technology. The National Programme for Information Technology launched in 2002 is the largest, non-military, non-scientific government-funded IT programme, with an estimated total cost exceeding £20 bn. This chapter is a longitudinal study of the National Care Record Service, which is the largest part of the programme, aimed to provide 50 million UK (English) citizens with an electronic health record. Using episodic interviewing techniques over ten years and secondary source material, the findings reveal a serious mismatch between health IT policy and the failure to rollout electronic health records on time and within budget. Key stakeholders, notably clinicians and patient groups, continuously question the policy and merits of the programme, not merely as a "technical challenge" but as a means of transforming working practices in healthcare. This study suggests that government agencies therefore need to extend their health technology assessment criteria to include cultural, social, and economic issues, as imposing centrist, top-down health IT policy needs to secure the "buy-in" from diverse and influential groups and individuals to ensure the successful adoption and implementation of health technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Currie, 2013. "Health it policy in the UK: the case of electronic health records," Post-Print hal-01132439, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01132439
    DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4546-2.ch019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01132439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.