IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00948721.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A comparative study of generational preferences for trip-planning resources: A case study of international tourists to Shanghai

Author

Listed:
  • Lanlung Chiang
  • Aikaterini Manthiou

    (Pôle Markets, Brands & Experiences - Rouen Business School - Rouen Business School)

  • Liang ( Rebecca) Tang
  • Jungyoung Shin
  • Alastair Morrison

Abstract

Although many previous studies have investigated the information search behavior in some specific age groups of tourists, few of them comprehensively examined the relationships between cross-generational tourists and their preferences for various types of trip-planning resources. This study aimed to fill this research gap. The authors employed correspondence analysis to assess and visually display the correlations between four generational groups--the Silent Generation (aged over 65), the Baby Boomers (aged 50-64 years), Generation X (aged 30-49 years), and Y (aged 18-29 years)--and 10 primary travel information sources for the Shanghai international tourist market. The results indicated that tourists in the Baby Boomers and Silent Generation groups rely most on travel agencies and tour operators. The Generation X tourists are inclined to search websites for their travel information. Generation Y tourists are more likely to consult friends and/or relatives and travel guidebooks. The study has both theoretical and practical contributions. The core values of generations are used to explain their preference of information sources from a theoretical perspective. This study assists destination marketers to design effective promotional strategies suited for different generational segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Lanlung Chiang & Aikaterini Manthiou & Liang ( Rebecca) Tang & Jungyoung Shin & Alastair Morrison, 2014. "A comparative study of generational preferences for trip-planning resources: A case study of international tourists to Shanghai," Post-Print hal-00948721, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00948721
    DOI: 10.1080/1528008X.2014.855536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00948721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.