IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le face-à-face OGM - agriculture biologique en Europe : entre réglementation et recommandation


  • Christophe Charlier

    () (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - UCA - Université Côte d'Azur - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

  • Alexandra Rufini

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - UCA - Université Côte d'Azur - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)


The European Regulation 834/2007, responsible for the definition of the European Organic Label since 2009, allows a non-intentional presence of authorised GMOs limited to the threshold of 0.9 % in organic production. Such a threshold, when strictly positive, allows organic producers to keep the organic label in case of a small GM contamination. However, it may bring discredit on the organic agriculture which can no more be understood as "GMO-free". The European Commission in its recommendation 2003/556/CE proposes that GM producers should bear the cost of the measures decided to limit the dissemination of the GM gene - the so-called "newcomer principle". European countries are however free to adopt such a principle and can proceed differently. This article presents an economic analysis of the determination of the optimal GMO threshold maximizing society's wellbeing when the newcomer principle is implemented and when it is not. This optimal GMO threshold in both cases is decided by an impartial regulator facing heterogeneous consumers, and is intended to ensure the coexistence between GM and organic agricultures, taking into account of the potential discredit it implies on organic agriculture and the flexibility it allows for the preservation of the organic label. We first establish the conditions for coexistence. We then show that i) the GMO threshold can be different from zero if the organic producers bear the cost of the coexistence measures and ii) the GMO threshold should be zero under the newcomer principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Charlier & Alexandra Rufini, 2013. "Le face-à-face OGM - agriculture biologique en Europe : entre réglementation et recommandation," Post-Print hal-00872184, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00872184
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Alain Bonnafous, 1992. "Transports et environnement," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 258(1), pages 121-128.
    2. Huwer, Ulrike, 2004. "Public transport and csar-sharing--benefits and effects of combined services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 77-87, January.
    3. Rietveld, Piet & Daniel, Vanessa, 2004. "Determinants of bicycle use: do municipal policies matter?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 531-550, August.
    4. Mackett, Roger L. & Lucas, Lindsey & Paskins, James & Turbin, Jill, 2003. "A methodology for evaluating walking buses as an instrument of urban transport policy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 179-186, July.
    5. Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2009. "Flexible transport services: A new market opportunity for public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 39-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Agriculture Biologique; OGM; Réglementation; Regulation; Organic Agriculture; GMO;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00872184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.