IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00832837.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Illusions of control and social domination strategies in knowledge mapping system use

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelie Dudezert

    (LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - EA 2606 - CentraleSupélec)

  • Leidner E. Dorothy

    (Baylor University, Hankamer School of Business, U.S.A - Chercheur indépendant)

Abstract

In recent years, the overload of information has driven companies to develop visualization technologies as a way to graphically represent knowledge for decision making. On the basis of visualization technologies and on knowledge modeling techniques, knowledge maps (Kmaps) help represent the knowledge assets of a company as graphical discrete objects. Yet such systems, because of their visual representation of knowledge, are prone to creating illusions. Using a case study of three firms' use of Kmaps in their Human Resource departments and drawing upon Bourdieu's social theory, illusion of control theory, and IS as signal and symbol theory, our study provides a critical perspective on the use of Kmaps by groups of actors to reinforce their social domination in business organizations. We find that Kmap use can lead to illusions of knowledge control and illusions of executive control and that in response to the potential for knowledge illusions, three social domination strategies - a signal and symbol strategy, an avoidance strategy and an evidence strategy - are employed. Implications of these results on Knowledge Management and Information Systems Management future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelie Dudezert & Leidner E. Dorothy, 2011. "Illusions of control and social domination strategies in knowledge mapping system use," Post-Print hal-00832837, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00832837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aurélie Dudézert & Nathalie Mitev & Ewan Oiry, 2021. "Cultural metaphors and KMS appropriation: drawing on Astérix to understand non-use in a large French company," Post-Print hal-03227049, HAL.
    2. Balaid, Ali & Abd Rozan, Mohd Zaidi & Hikmi, Syed Norris & Memon, Jamshed, 2016. "Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 451-475.
    3. Chi-Wen Chen & Marios Koufaris, 2015. "The impact of decision support system features on user overconfidence and risky behavior," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 607-623, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00832837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.