IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

L'application de la théorie des facilités essentielles dans la décision du Conseil de la concurrence Voyages-scnf.com : Une analyse économique

Listed author(s):
  • Frédéric Marty

    ()

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - CNRS)

  • Julien Pillot

    ()

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - CNRS)

In its decision n°09-D-06, the French Competition Agency fined SNCF and Expedia Inc. for several anticompetitive behaviours in the online journeys selling sector. As an implicit enforcement of the essential facilities doctrine, two notified complaints relative to a potential abuse of dominance sound particularly interesting. On the one hand, this article aims at analyzing if the decision is relevant and consistent with the French and European case-laws. On the second hand, we ponder the effectiveness of SNCF's commitments to match anticompetitive concerns and to create favorable conditions for the emergence of new players in the relevant market.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00634308.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 01 Apr 2009
Publication status: Published in Revue Lamy de la concurrence, 2009, 19 (2), pp.20-26
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00634308
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00634308
Contact details of provider: Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00634308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.